writeright1 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Are scavenged carcasses more likely to give you food poisoning than fresh kills or is it all the same? I'm thinking that wolves and such would leave far more bacteria on a partially devoured kill than would be there on a fresh one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hesha Posted November 25, 2015 Share Posted November 25, 2015 I think it is mostly based on the percentage status of the meat. So far, eating raw meat/fish has given me FP every single time (about 7 or 8 times)... cooked meat is dangerous below 70% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kraelman Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Even above 70% cooked meat can get you. I've gotten it twice in the last 15 days in one of my runs, once at 74% and once at 73%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amazombie Posted November 28, 2015 Share Posted November 28, 2015 but to answer your question....no there is not difference if you scavenge or not.I tend to leave a wolf roaming around just for that purpose, I can save on bullets by harvesting what they kill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveP Posted November 28, 2015 Share Posted November 28, 2015 I think they may have fixed the problem with calculating probability of various events so food poisoning is less likely in the latest release however more food items cause FP. I seem able to consume any packaged foods without worry but others report not. The granola bars seem to be most likely. It's just too difficult to make accurate observations using only anecdotal evidence. We need to resort to testing just to measure the various meat decay factors. It sure seems buggy. I would need to see the source code. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.