Dinhammer Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 I don't know if this question has been answered before, but... is the quantity of or condition of bait meat supposed to have anything to do with the duration by which wolves are delayed in resuming aggro? I got the impression from reviewing past discussions that the two were proportional in some way. After noticing I didn't get much mileage out of dropping a high-calorie gift for my lupine friends, I got curious and ran a few tests just now. Over three trials each, I tested the length of time the attack was forestalled by A) cooked rabbit meat, 0.09 lbs @ 9% and B) cooked deer meat, 2.20 lbs @ 91%. (This was as extreme a difference as I had in my locker at the time.) The average for group A) was 10.9 seconds. The average for group B) was 11.3 seconds. I'd imagine the chief difference between the two was merely the promptness of my thumb in clicking the stopwatch. Does this line up with the way bait meat has behaved in previous alpha versions? At present, there seems to be no difference. Whatever the case, I hope someone will find this useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
romerabr Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 I did... Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Ruler of OP8 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 hmmm, good to know my strategy of only feeding wolves 10-20 calorie pieces of meat is still solid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selfless Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 It has always been so. Even more fun: Bears do not actually eat their bait. They seem to just roll it around in their mouth until it becomes uninteresting. ( I can hear them doing it. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.