I didn't post this as a bug, because I'm not sure it is one, but this scene, after a day's fishing, is patently absurd: Does the size difference and calorie count not seem a little ridiculous? IRL, I would probably have a great deal of difficulty finishing off a Lake Whitefish of that size, and it's only 387 Calories? Granted, the size of fish also includes guts, skin and skeleton which would not be eaten, but how come a much smaller fish has almost 4 times the calorific value? I belie